Dick Morris: Kirk was killed by squad of trans-sexuals trained, incited and armed to kill

AlwaysWrite

Addicted Member
[The following article was written by Dick Morris and published Sept. 15 on his dickmorris.com Web site]

THE POLITICAL LEFT HAS INCITED A GOON SQUAD OF TRANSSEXUALS, BRAINWASHING THEM INTO BELIEVING THAT CONSERVATIVES ARE THEIR WORST ENEMY, SIDETRACKING THEM AT EVERY TURN. THEY CONJURE A ‘FASCIST MOVEMENT’ THAT WANTS TO PERSECUTE THEM, DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AND MARGINALIZE THEM

To do battle against these imaginary foes, they label their opponents “fascist” and enlist their fellow trans population even to the point of inciting them to murder conservative thinkers and teachers.

But their grevences are largely illusory. There is no avalanche of discriminatory legislation and rules pending in legislatures or congress against them. No plans for segregation or expulsion No terrorist group like the Klu klux klan lurks outside of school to attack them.

That the trans community has been in the cross hairs of political partisan controversy is simply because their advocates support, in effect, kidnapping under age minors and, using public funds, to persuade them to undergo dangerous surgical and hormonal treatment to change who they are often without parental permission or even notification. That and their demands that trans athletes compete on equal terms with other students who have not been surgically or hormonally altered.

These requests are not of the genocidal nature the left likes to attack, but apparently are draconian enough to incite violence and even murder.

In targeting an audience of young people who are so unsettled that they want to change their gender, the left has hit upon the raw material for a goon squad, later day brown shirts, to keep the pot boiling and try to cow moderate and reasonable voices into submission.

The left has walled off the trans community and taught it to hate and fear normal people. It has given them guns and sufficient training to shoot out a man’s jugular at 200 yards with a single bullet. And that is the true story of the murder of Charlie Kirk.
 
The following is just PERSONAL speculation ...

* It may not be simply a coincidence that Kirk was shot at exactly the same time as he started to respond to a question regarding transgender shooters -- specifically a question about how many transgender shooters there were.

* It seems as if the alleged shooter (Tyler Robinson) is now attempting to emphasize that he was acting alone, and I'm not convinced that he wasn't linked to a plot involving other individuals. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino will continue to investigate whether others were directly involved in the shooting.
 
Last edited:
I've scoured the footage of the shot, the get a way, and the search for hours. There are too many things that don;t add up in this and it's going to be another JFK debacle.
 
... but he ditched the rifle into a nearby wooded area.
Bill he was not in possession of a rifle while escaping from the roof of the building according to the videos. How could the rifle mysteriously appear in the woods by itself? How could he fire an invisible weapon? IOW he is on the roof apparently WITHOUT a weapon. He was video recorded running across the roof wearing a backpack. Then, he climbs down to a ledge, and jumps to the ground below. No rifle is in his possession. Again- no rifle in his possession. Then he runs across a parking lot (still no weapon in his possession) and flees into the trees. How is it possible for the rifle to be in one place and the shooter in another? It makes absolutely no sense.
 
Last edited:
Not until he jumped off the roof. BUT!!!!!!!! The video I posted clearly shows he could not have done it.
Dear Greg T:

When I posted in this thread earlier, I hadn't been able to access the viideo you posted. But now that I have seen it, I have additional commrnent.

The way I see it, as per the videos, Tyler Robinson wasn't in possession of a rifle while escaping from the roof, so I agree with REVerse. And how did the rifle appear in the woods by itself? Then, if the ballistics data (shown in the video) is credible, what's the real story?
 
Dear Greg T:

When I posted in this thread earlier, I hadn't been able to access the viideo you posted. But now that I have seen it, I have additional commrnent.

The way I see it, as per the videos, Tyler Robinson wasn't in possession of a rifle while escaping from the roof, so I agree with REVerse. And how did the rifle appear in the woods by itself? Then, if the ballistics data (shown in the video) is credible, what's the real story?

He's a patsy, like Oswald. I think the rifle was there BEFORE the shot went off. His running off the building in that direction lead the investigation to the "weapon". Shot came from a different angle and hole in his neck was an exit wound. Entrance wound would NOT bleed like that.
 
Bill he was not in possession of a rifle while escaping from the roof of the building according to the videos. How could the rifle mysteriously appear in the woods by itself? How could he fire an invisible weapon? IOW he is on the roof apparently WITHOUT a weapon. He was video recorded running across the roof wearing a backpack. Then, he climbs down to a ledge, and jumps to the ground below. No rifle is in his possession. Again- no rifle in his possession. Then he runs across a parking lot (still no weapon in his possession) and flees into the trees. How is it possible for the rifle to be in one place and the shooter in another? It makes absolutely no sense.
I think he threw the rifle off the building on the other side where the camera isn't at. Keep in mind the Parking lot roof top video is awful.
 
I think he threw the rifle off the building on the other side where the camera isn't at. Keep in mind the Parking lot roof top video is awful.
So if he threw it off the roof -who put it in the woods?

He knew it was in the woods from the notes that he left to his gay friend.

Sorry bro, I’m not buying that.
 
So if he threw it off the roof -who put it in the woods?

He knew it was in the woods from the notes that he left to his gay friend.

Sorry bro, I’m not buying that.
He took it there. You see him round the corner of the building. My guess is he threw the rifle into the ground there. The other option is that you see him lay the rifle in the gutter or at the edge of the roof and then grab it. It also explains why some were saying the scope looked off. Lots of folks saying he disassemble and put in a bag but there is no proof of that.
 
Last edited:
That video the guy posted is trash. He can say all he wants about what's behind Charlie in that video but that could be anything. The problem with being shot from behind is that there really isn't a way that makes any sense at that angle. The tent was up against a wall of a multistory building. The bullet would have traveled into the crowd. They have the bullet from my understanding.

It takes high speed cameras to catch any real meaningful images and the video at best was at 30fps. This is the problem with the roof video. It's far away and looks like it might be 15fps and it's hard to see the rifle.
 
Back
Top