NEW SHOOTING

ILLEGAL GUNS? HOW MANY RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERS OWN NON REGISTERED GUNS? FROM FEAR OF GOVERNMENT RESTRICTIONS.
 
CANT ANSWER THE FIRST QUESTION BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY OF KNOWING.
TAKING YOUR GUNS WOULD ELIMINATE THE POSSIBLE STEALING OF YOUR GUNS BY THE DREGS AND PUTTING EVEN MORE GUNS OUT THERE. MAKING IT AUTOMATIC DEATH PENALTY FOR COMMITING A CRIME WITH A GUN WOULD ELIMINATE 90% OF VIOLENT CRIMES. THUS REMOVING EVEN MORE GUNS FROM THE DREGS.
AND YOU DIDNT ANSWER MY QUESTION.
 
WAMO, read my posts 7/8/12 and especially (most importantly) #19. We're not talking about eliminating violent crime, we're talking about mass shootings.

You need to go from arguing to acceptance of mass shootings. Get your pre-"thoughts and prayers" on for the next one. This is simply a byproduct of our rights.
 
Last edited:
CANT ANSWER THE FIRST QUESTION BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY OF KNOWING.
TAKING YOUR GUNS WOULD ELIMINATE THE POSSIBLE STEALING OF YOUR GUNS BY THE DREGS AND PUTTING EVEN MORE GUNS OUT THERE. MAKING IT AUTOMATIC DEATH PENALTY FOR COMMITING A CRIME WITH A GUN WOULD ELIMINATE 90% OF VIOLENT CRIMES. THUS REMOVING EVEN MORE GUNS FROM THE DREGS.
AND YOU DIDNT ANSWER MY QUESTION.

LMFAO!! You're fucking with me again, aren't you? You can't be serious. You think ALL the illegal guns that are used to kill thousands of people every year are stolen from law abiding citizens? The vast majority of the guns used in the "gun deaths" are justifiable, and the murders such as Chitown, Detroit, etc. are coming in from Mexico, the deep web, and other countries. There MAY be a stolen gun that is used now and then but that's it. I'll answer the question for you. Taking MY gun away will accomplish nothing more than making ME a victim. Period.

More people are killed in car crashes every year than killed with guns. So....what ya gonna do?
 
Last edited:
WAMO, read my posts 7/8/12 and especially (most importantly) #19. We're not talking about eliminating violent crime, we're talking about mass shootings.

You need to go from arguing to acceptance of mass shootings. Get your pre-"thoughts and prayers" on for the next one. This is simply a byproduct of our rights.

I don't hear any solutions coming from your way, either. How would you plan to remove the guns from criminals without infringing on my rights?
 
I don't hear any solutions coming from your way, either. How would you plan to remove the guns from criminals without infringing on my rights?

I accept your rights Greg, and the mass shootings that come along with those rights. It is "the cost of doing business". I am apathetic.

My contention remains that someone who walks into a school with the intention of killing as many people as possible will kill far fewer people if he’s armed with a knife, or a machete, or a crossbow, or even a spear or a harpoon, than he would with his mom’s assault rifle.

America’s annual gun-related deaths are far higher than those of any other developed country and most developing countries. About one in every 10,000 Americans will be shot to death this year. The rate for other developed countries is between one and two per 100,000.
 
AND YOU STILL DIDNT ANSWER MY QUESTION G.
AND I NEVER SAID ALL THE GUN DEATHS WERE FROM STOLEN GUNS. COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN, EVEN IF NOONE GETS SHOT, AUTO DEATH PENALTY. PERIOD. VIOLENT CRIME DROPS 90%.
AND REMOVING YOUR GUNS, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. YOU CAN ONLY SPECULATE WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN. THAT MAKES YOU AFRAID. BEING AFRAID MAKES YOU PARANOID. BEING PARANOID MAKES YOU INCAPABLE OF MAKING RASH DECISIONS IN A BAD SITUATION. THEREFORE, NO GUNS.
 
AND THOSE PEOPLE AT THE CONCERT IN VEGAS. WHAT ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS G? DO WE JUST SWEEP THEM UNDER THE RUG BECAUSE A "RESPONSIBLE" GUN OWNER DECIDED NOT TO BE RESPONSIBLE ANYMORE? WHO'S NEXT? NOONE KNOWS.
 
AND GT, YOU ARE RIGHT. THE 2A IS THE ONLY THING GUN OWNERS HAVE TO STAND ON. NO MATER HOW MANY DIE, THEIR 2A IS THE LAST WORD. NOONE ELSES RIGHTS MATER TO THEM AS LONG AS THEY GET TO KEEP THEIR GUNS.
 
AND THOSE PEOPLE AT THE CONCERT IN VEGAS. WHAT ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS G? DO WE JUST SWEEP THEM UNDER THE RUG BECAUSE A "RESPONSIBLE" GUN OWNER DECIDED NOT TO BE RESPONSIBLE ANYMORE? WHO'S NEXT? NOONE KNOWS.

They're the price we absorb for "freedom". "It doesn't matter that he could mow 59 down at one time BECAUSE he'd just use a knife or bomb (b/c it's that easy to get) if he couldn't get the guns" is my understanding.
 
AND GT, YOU ARE RIGHT. THE 2A IS THE ONLY THING GUN OWNERS HAVE TO STAND ON. NO MATER HOW MANY DIE, THEIR 2A IS THE LAST WORD. NOONE ELSES RIGHTS MATER TO THEM AS LONG AS THEY GET TO KEEP THEIR GUNS.

Right! Taking Greg's guns just makes him vulnerable to criminals and he wouldn't be able to check the government tanks and F-22 Raptor's if he didn't have his guns. Taking the rights that Jesus Christ himself descended down to inform the founding fathers what to put in the constitution would eliminate this check....Waco Texas proved this by their heroic and successful stand against the government.
 
I accept your rights Greg, and the mass shootings that come along with those rights. It is "the cost of doing business". I am apathetic.

My contention remains that someone who walks into a school with the intention of killing as many people as possible will kill far fewer people if he’s armed with a knife, or a machete, or a crossbow, or even a spear or a harpoon, than he would with his mom’s assault rifle.

America’s annual gun-related deaths are far higher than those of any other developed country and most developing countries. About one in every 10,000 Americans will be shot to death this year. The rate for other developed countries is between one and two per 100,000.

No, mass shootings have no connection to the 2A what so ever. The 2A simply states we have a right to bear arms. It's not a right to murder. You and wamo both are connecting the right to carry a gun with the right to murder. You are right about one thing, tho. A person armed with a gun will usually kill more people than if he were armed with a knife. BUT, a person armed with explosives can kill many more and much quicker than a person with a gun. I guarranty you that if guns magically disappeared off the face of the earth tomorrow that the violent crime rate would only fail to drop, it would increase. Take a look at the stats for Venezuela, Cuba, U.K., Australia and many more countries that have tightened their laws and/or removed guns. Then, take a look at Switzerland, who now with a few exceptions, requires everyone to own a weapon. But compare apples to apples. Violent crime. Not just gun deaths, violent crime and murders. You'll find some very interesting data once you've looked it over.
 
AND GT, YOU ARE RIGHT. THE 2A IS THE ONLY THING GUN OWNERS HAVE TO STAND ON. NO MATER HOW MANY DIE, THEIR 2A IS THE LAST WORD. NOONE ELSES RIGHTS MATER TO THEM AS LONG AS THEY GET TO KEEP THEIR GUNS.

Now you're being totally absurd. Come back when you have something intelligent to say.
 
YOU STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED MY QUESTION.
ABSURD? I AM SURE IT IS ABSURD, TO GUN OWNERS. NO RATIONAL REASON WHAT SO EVER OTHER THAN THE 2A. AND ABSURD HAS GONE BOTH WAYS SIR.
 
YOU STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED MY QUESTION.
ABSURD? I AM SURE IT IS ABSURD, TO GUN OWNERS. NO RATIONAL REASON WHAT SO EVER OTHER THAN THE 2A. AND ABSURD HAS GONE BOTH WAYS SIR.

You have not answered mine. I want you to give me a good solid explanation of how you plan to get guns away from criminals by taking away the legal ones. It's a simple question that I have asked you at least 4 times now.
 
OFFER DRUGS AND OR MONEY TO CRIMINALS TO TURN THEIR GUNS IN.
MAKE DEATH PENALTY MANDATORY WHEN USED IN A CRIME. MOST CRIMINALS WILL TURN THEIRS IN.
ANYONE CAUGHT SELLING GUNS GETS AUTO DEATH PENALTY.
OFFER PEOPLE MONETARY INCENTIVE TO TURN PEOPLE IN THAT HAVE ILLEGAL GUNS.
OK, YOUR TURN.
 
OFFER DRUGS AND OR MONEY TO CRIMINALS TO TURN THEIR GUNS IN.
MAKE DEATH PENALTY MANDATORY WHEN USED IN A CRIME. MOST CRIMINALS WILL TURN THEIRS IN.
ANYONE CAUGHT SELLING GUNS GETS AUTO DEATH PENALTY.
OFFER PEOPLE MONETARY INCENTIVE TO TURN PEOPLE IN THAT HAVE ILLEGAL GUNS.
OK, YOUR TURN.

You're living in a delusional fantasy world. So, a gunman turns in his gun, gets his high, and while looking for his next fix picks up another piece from Rollo's trunk in exchange for a "favor". Now what? He uses his new piece to rob or kill someone for his next fix.

"Most" criminals will turn theirs in? Show me the evidence of that. Present your proof. I'm willing to bet you may have an extremely insignificant number of turn ins.

Death penalty?? Not one liberal in the country would vote for that. Inmates rights, remember?

Pay average Joes to snitch on a neighbor? How Hitleresque of you.
 
SO, THE GUNMAN TAKES THE MONEY INSTEAD AND GOES AND FEEDS HIS FAMILY AND DECIDES TO NEVER BE A GUNMAN AGAIN. OR COPS FOLLOW THE GUNMAN, BUST ROLLO AND ROLLO IS PUT TO DEATH. LOTS OF ILLEGAL GUNS OFF THE STREET.
TURN GUNS IN. INSIGNIFCANT NUMBER OF TURN INS? SHOW ME YOUR STATS. NEITHER ONE OF US KNOW A NUMBER. I WOULD JUST HOPE FOR THE BEST IN PEOPLE. YOU THINK THERE IS NO HOPE IN PEOPLE.
DEATH PENALTY. IF INMATES WALK ON THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE THEY VICTIMIZE, THEY LOSE ANY RIGHTS THEY HAD BEFORE THAT.
HITLERESQUE? REALLY! IF YOU KNOW OF A CRIME AND DONT REPORT IT, YOUR AN ACCOMPLICE TO A CRIME. AND THERE IS A SAYING, "SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING".
SEE, THERE WOULD NEVER BE AN ANSWER I COULD GIVE THAT YOU WOULDNT TWIST TO FIT YOUR POINT OF VIEW.
SO, YOUR TURN.
 
Back
Top