You would think. But to date, Barr has done nothing since occupying the office. Theres so much blatant corruption that Ray Charles could see it with one eye tied behind his back.
Last edited:
THE ELECTION FRAUD THREAD
- Thread starter AlwaysWrite
- Start date
I watched this entire hearing. This one is good, but the lady at the end that spent 30 years in the SOS office and coordinated the elections was amazing. She says there are 5 counties where election has been rampant for decades. I'll see if I can find a vid.
W...T.....F....
rumble.com
Video Evidence Shows Georgia Poll Workers Pulling Out Suitcases of Ballots
Video Evidence Shows Georgia Poll Workers Pulling Out Suitcases of Ballots
rumble.com
W...T.....F....
Video Evidence Shows Georgia Poll Workers Pulling Out Suitcases of Ballots
Video Evidence Shows Georgia Poll Workers Pulling Out Suitcases of Ballots
It doesn't matter anymore. AG Barr, the useless piece of shit who has done nothing since holding the office, says there is not enough evidence to make a difference. I watched the michigan hearings and there's enough right here to flip the popular vote in the country! Get out your red flag, comrade.
bbfreeburn
Active Member
So, Greg, Barr accidentally tells the truth one time and he’s a pos? Don’t pay attention to his near perfect record of telling lies
Not at all. I've said it for a long time. When he took the position heads were supposed to roll. Russia, Clinton foundation, Clinton emails, yada yada. So far he's produced ZERO. This case is no different. Every state has proof of massive fraud. Yes, I've been watching the hearings and the surveilance clips. Ray Charles could see this corruption with one eye tied behind his back. Theres enough fake votes in one michigan county to flip the state. Barr..... useless
bbfreeburn
Active Member
Maybe Barr follows real admissible evidence Not innuendo and rumors. I say again if your “evidence “ is so damning why hasn’t any court acted on it? And why won’t he lawyers use the word “fraud” in court? (Hint: there are severe penalties for lawyers who lie in court)
Apparently you're not watching the hearings, or the news networks that actually show them uncut. Keep in mind that all these hanging states are under liberal control. Of course a liberal supreme court will toss the suits and refuse a forensic audit. But hundreds of eye witnesses testifying under penalty of perjury and actual survreilance footage is admissible. But crooked courts will assist the crooked election.
bbfreeburn
Active Member
You mean the “hearings” where no one is speaking under oath? Giuliani kept pointing this out in Michigan
The hearings where they had to submit their signed and sworn affidavits.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear Greg T:
Then again, Barr and his "special investigator" Durham haven't found ANYTHING WRONG with the origins of the multi-year Russian Hoax, and they haven't found any wrongdoing by Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, the Bidens, etc. etc.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear Greg T:
Barr IS better than his predecessor Jeff Sessions ... BUT THAT ISN'T SAYING ANYTHING!
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
If it's not already in the works, THEY NEED TO DEPOSE THOSE 4 GEORGIA POLL WORKERS who stayed and unloaded the suitcases full of ballots. Those workers probably have some "excuses" ready if that were to happen, BUT IT DOES NEED TO HAPPEN IMMEDIATELY!